What if we further require quines to apply at least one function that
they contain? I want to include Eduardo's function in the class of
"impressive" ones.
Neil ⊥
On 02/24/2012 06:35 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
This is pretty boring too. :)
""
""
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Neil Toronto<neil.toro...@gmail.com> wrote:
I dunno. It might work better if we require quines to produce themselves in
quoted form. Then the empty program isn't one.
Neil
On 02/24/2012 06:28 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
Doesn't work as well in Racket as in Scheme, that one!
Robby
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Eduardo Bellani<ebell...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Does this count?
((λ (x) (list x (list 'quote x))) '(λ (x) (list x (list 'quote x))))
On 02/23/2012 04:52 PM, Gary Baumgartner wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:04:50PM -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
[...]
What is this thing? It seems coolly symmetric in this view:
[...]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomae%27s_function
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
--
Eduardo Bellani
fear is an alarm, not a compass.
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
