On the subject of porting #lang racket  to  #lang web-server code

I provide a few lessons learned for the archives for the next person to attempt this.

1) Bindings, Serializability , and anonymous functions

1A) the predicate serializable? from racket/serializable is invaluable

#lang web-server code will not transform if there are non-serializable constructs in the dynamic extent of the invocation of send/suspend

some minor surprises/lessons learned:

1B) anonymous functions are not serializable

(serializable? (λ (x) x))  ;->#f

1C) anonymous functions in a list are not serializable

 (serializable? (car (list (λ (x) x) (λ (x) x)))) ;->#f

1D) once given a module-level binding, anonymous functions become serializable

(define foo (list (λ (x) x) (λ (x) x)))

(serializable? (car foo))  ;->#t

1E)  void is not  serializable

(serializable? void) ;->#f

1F) anonymous functions bound within a letrec form are serializable


2) 'attempt to cross a continuation barrier' exceptions

invocations of native continuations reified with call/cc seemed to frequently throw this error

I haven't done enough analysis to understand why and under what conditions, but in all cases I was able to remediate by enclosing the invocation as follows.

 (call-with-continuation-prompt  k (default-continuation-prompt-tag)

3) with-continuation-marks, continuation-marks, and current-continuation-marks can be used to replace dynamic-wind

Again, thank you. I think the stateless web-language is important technology and must have required an enormous amount of work to implement.

Anedcotally, application speed seems at or better than the stateful code.

R./
Zack

On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:

On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:03:02 -0600,Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> mumbled:
I'm not sure if the web-server supports continuation marks or not

The stateless transformation does support continuation marks, provided the keys and values are serializable. (Parameters/exception handlers are not supported because the key is not serializable.)
Jay
____________________
  Racket Users list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Reply via email to