On 10/28/2011 12:39 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
40 minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
I would expect
(not (and (apply< x) (apply> x)))
to be true for all x
This, and many other points, were all part of a pretty big thread on
the R6RS list a while ago.
http://lists.r6rs.org/pipermail/r6rs-discuss/2008-October/003566.html
Since so much verbiage was used then, it would be useful to go over
it in this context too.
I just finished reading that thread. I will now thank the Racket
community for not making the most inane points made over there, back then.
For the purposes of this discussion, the big difference between Racket
and R6RS is that we already have variable-arity comparison operators.
(And I love them. Checking between-ness is so easy.)
Neil T
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
