40 minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote: > I would expect > > (not (and (apply < x) (apply > x))) > > to be true for all x
This, and many other points, were all part of a pretty big thread on the R6RS list a while ago. http://lists.r6rs.org/pipermail/r6rs-discuss/2008-October/003566.html Since so much verbiage was used then, it would be useful to go over it in this context too. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
