On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Carl Eastlund <c...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > "Joe Marshall picked the wrong way to generalize <=" is not a reason, > historical or otherwise, for <= not being generalized to 0 or 1 > arguments.
Certainly not, but it carries the same weight as "Carl Eastlund claims Joe's generalization is wrong." On the other hand, providing code to demonstrate a particular way of generalizing may carry more weight than a simple assertion of incorrectness. But I could be wrong here as well. -- ~jrm _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
