On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Dan Grossman <d...@cs.washington.edu> wrote: > Very minor point, but is there a rationale beyond historical precedent > for + and * to allow any number of arguments but, =, <=, <, >, >= to > require at least two arguments?
0 is the additive identity. 1 is the multiplicative identity. What is the equality identity? -- ~jrm _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
