Hi All, Just my two cents. :-) I am coming from the "original Lisp" point of view as well.At the beginning of the discussion I have not undertood any of the answers. They were"very cryptic" to me as well, but I have to say that these two papers made clear whatis the position of DrRacket and I understand this. I am not sure why these papers made itclear and the discussion did not. Sorry.I will even try to incorporate these into my own teaching and thinking. :-)I am still with DrRacket. :-))) Peter Ivanyi Danny Yoo <d...@cs.wpi.edu> írta: > 2. Several people have given a justification for why the default >in Racket prints things in a way that's different from what you're >used to. The difference is not accidental: it's there by design. For >example, you can see Section 3.3 of >http://www.cs.brown.edu/~sk/Publications/Papers/Published/fffkf-drscheme-journal/paper.pdf, >as well as Section 2.1 of Wadler's "Why Calculating is Better than >Scheming" (http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/dat/miranda/wadler87.pdf)
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
