An hour ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>
> This is not a good argument, if I'm understanding you correctly. I
> think you're saying "it is too annoying to give a good error
> message" which is not a reasonable argument.
No, I said just this:
> > That would involve changing more than I'm comfortable with in that
> > file.
You can translate this to a variation of "patches welcome", except
that it's not my code to really welcome them...
The rest of my message was a description of what's involved, which I
think would be useful for anyone who wants to take it.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
