About two weeks ago, Danny Yoo wrote: > I survived in scribbling some documentation for a simple PLaneT > package. [...] > > It fails because the basic, default evaluator doesn't know about my > PLaneT package's bindings.
Yes, this is a very-much-intended feature -- you don't want random examples code to mess with your documentation. > [...] > > ../../../../gpfs/data/pro/plt-data/software/racket/5.1.1/std/collects/scribble/eval.rkt:126:11: > string=?: expects type <string> as 2nd argument, given: #f; other > arguments were: "" > [...] > Oh. Ok, so I need to do something extra with the evaluator setup; > it looks like I've forgotten to tell it to feed sandbox output and > sandbox-error-output, as described in > http://docs.racket-lang.org/scribble/eval.html. Ok, let me try that > next. Yes, that seems like a bad uncaught error. I made it catch that, and throw an informative error, saying: format-output: missing output, possibly from a sandbox without a configured `sandbox-output' I'm not happy with it -- the "format-output: ..." seems like it's too easy to translate to "probably some internal bug, not my problem". Any suggestions for a better message? -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
