On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 01:09, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote:
> 15 minutes ago, Rodolfo Carvalho wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 00:40, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > If you get the impression that I dislike what python does with > > > quoting, then that would be a correct one... > > > > You made that enough clear. > > Sorry, I didn't mean to make it sound like flaming. I just spent a > good amount of time on various quoting facilities (and ended up with > the scribble syntax which directly deals with this issue). > I didn't read that as a flame. :) I enjoy to admire and discuss different choices, and their consequences. > > > > Consistent, composable, clear, easy to explain. > > Right. The only thing that I'd change here is that a design that is > easy to explain is one that is consistent etc. > Ok, well noted, I need to improve my wording to be more educative (when I will want to tell someone about that).
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
