Carl Eastlund wrote at 06/03/2011 10:47 PM:
To clarify this, Racket reuses the syntax of strings for regexps.  A
regexp is first read as a string, then parsed into a regular
expression.  So if "\d" is the same as "d" as a string, the regexp
parser never sees the backslash.  We do not currently have a reader
for regexps that skips this intermediate step.

Also, regexps used to be specified using strings in Racket, and still can be, for good reason:

   (regexp (string-append "^\\d+ " (regexp-quote some-var) "$"))

   #rx"^\\d+"

As a programmer, getting escaping right is hard enough as it is. You wouldn't want to do escaping one way for string literals and a different way for #rx -- that would be begging for hard-to-find bugs.

--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/

_________________________________________________
 For list-related administrative tasks:
 http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Reply via email to