On Feb 13, 2011, at 10:15 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Going back to that root requirement... I think that unit testing should be so > central to contemporary programming that we should just pick some syntax that > makes sense for practical development both large and small, use it > everywhere, and simply expect people who are looking at the source to know > what Racket unit tests look like. If we can do this canonical test syntax > sensibly, and the syntax is set up so that we can plug in our own user > interfaces for running the tests, I will convert all my existing and new open > source code to use this canonical syntax. How about you look at three test suites and make a concrete proposal and take on the task of implementing the merger. We'll grant you write access to the repository in return -- Matthias _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
