On Feb 13, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
the `=>' is going to be required
-or- there's a single expression to test for a non-#f result, and
you'll use a nested `test' expression for those non-#f things. This
still makes things less convenient for using random predicates, but
not much. For example, a `fib' test suite that can currently look
like this:
(test (exact-nonnegative-integer? (fib 10))
(fib 10) => 55)
would instead be written as:
(test (test (exact-nonnegative-integer? (fib 10)))
(fib 10) => 55)
How is this an improvement on
(test (exact-nonnegative-integer? (fib 10)) => #t
(fib 10) => 55)
which doesn't require any special cases at all?
Stephen Bloch
sbl...@adelphi.edu
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
