On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:41 PM, John Clements <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: > > On Jan 26, 2011, at 4:29 AM, Casey Klein wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:27 AM, John Clements >> <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: >>> I would expect this program to signal an error: >>> >>> #lang lazy >>> >>> (define zeros (cons 0 zeros)) >>> >>> (define should-be-error (list-ref (take 15 zeros) 1324)) >>> >>> >>> ... but instead should-be-error is bound to zero. How can I take the >>> 1000th element of a list with only 15 elements? I'm tempted to make snide >>> comments about laziness, but I'm sure it'll backfire when it turns out that >>> somehow that's the right answer after all. >>> >>> Bug report? >>> >> >> Sure enough: >> >> http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view&pr=11458 > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but this appears to be a different issue.
Sorry, I missed the "should-be-error is bound to zero" part of your message! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
