I get an error in 5.0.2, rather than 0. --Mark
P.S. I was surprised to see that list-ref in #lang lazy takes the args in opposite order than in #lang racket (which takes the list first). On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:27 PM, John Clements <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org>wrote: > I would expect this program to signal an error: > > #lang lazy > > (define zeros (cons 0 zeros)) > > (define should-be-error (list-ref (take 15 zeros) 1324)) > > > ... but instead should-be-error is bound to zero. How can I take the > 1000th element of a list with only 15 elements? I'm tempted to make snide > comments about laziness, but I'm sure it'll backfire when it turns out that > somehow that's the right answer after all. > > Bug report? > > John > > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
