Having read some of the stuff, l am not impressed. Yes, in some cases we may want to introduce a binding not named in a macro call. Racket and R6RS (macro-case) do that very well. That for a beginner it is difficult to prepare unhegienic macros: jolly good! I have misused datum->syntax a couple of times, just to find out later that I did not need it realy (although I recognize that in some cases it may be usefull) Jos
> -----Original Message----- > From: users-boun...@racket-lang.org > [mailto:users-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Matthias Felleisen > Sent: 20 November 2010 17:08 > To: Robby Findler > Cc: Carl Eastlund; users@racket-lang.org > Subject: Re: [racket] letoverlambda > > > On Nov 20, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > > > Good thing we're not Scheme anymore. > > :-) You think that guy would believe you? > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
