I remember.
On Monday, September 20, 2010, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Robby Findler > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> Well, I agree that the sentence is misleading. It is not at all clear >> (at least to this reader) that the second half of the sentence was >> restricting itself to a narrow definition of libraries. > > Remember, the subject of the sentence is Scheme, not Racket. Racket > is a lot better in this regard; for example, lists are immutable. > -- > sam th > sa...@ccs.neu.edu > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
