Well, I agree that the sentence is misleading. It is not at all clear (at least to this reader) that the second half of the sentence was restricting itself to a narrow definition of libraries.
Robby On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: > Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 09/20/2010 08:43 AM: > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: > > > Scheme provides [...], but little in the way of library support. > > > For the record, I think that line is a bit dated. It's a good line for > hustling the CL people in the audience, though. :) > > > In terms of support strictly for *functional* programming, I think it's > true. > > My bad; I misparsed the text and then edited out a key part. That'll teach > me to shoot off my mouth at 3am. It's especially bad of me, since I have > been wanting better library support/interoperation for FP. :) > > -- > http://www.neilvandyke.org/ > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
