That's damn cute!
On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:41 PM, Stevie Strickland wrote: > On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:33 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote: >> On 07/21/2010 05:26 AM, Robby Findler wrote: >>> One, non-optimal way to get the contracts is to evaluate the module >>> and use object-contract on the exports (non-optimal because dependent >>> contracts will have ...s in them, etc). >> `object-contract' looks like its only for stuff from the class system, >> right? Did you mean some other function? > > I believe he meant 'value-contract'. That'll give you the contract for > values that have it stored appropriately, and then you can use > 'contract-name' on the contract to get a s-expression representation. > > Stevie _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
