On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:33 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote: > On 07/21/2010 05:26 AM, Robby Findler wrote: >> One, non-optimal way to get the contracts is to evaluate the module >> and use object-contract on the exports (non-optimal because dependent >> contracts will have ...s in them, etc). > `object-contract' looks like its only for stuff from the class system, right? > Did you mean some other function?
I believe he meant 'value-contract'. That'll give you the contract for values that have it stored appropriately, and then you can use 'contract-name' on the contract to get a s-expression representation. Stevie _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users