I don't know if its any faster but you could try: library(zoo) z <- zoo(v) rollapply(z, len, function(x) rank(x)[len])
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:21 PM, zerdna <az...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Could someone give me an idea on how to do rolling ranking, i.e. rank in the > moving window of last 100 numbers in a long vector? I tried naive solution > like > > roll.rank<-function(v, len){ > r<-numeric(length(v)-len+1) > for(i in len:length(v)) > r[i-len+1]<-rank(v[(i-len+1):i])[len] > r > > } > > However, it turns out pretty slow even on my rather able Linux box. For > example, doing roll.rank(rnorm(50000), 100) takes 5 second, so for typical > data i operate which is matrices of the size 1000 x 50000 i will need to > wait 1.5 hours for one calculation. Does someone know a trick to properly do > it quicker? > -- > View this message in context: > http://n4.nabble.com/efficient-rolling-rank-tp2013535p2013535.html > Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.