<http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm071072.htm> http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm071072.htm
Tho only software "products" explicitely mentioned in this documents are ... WinBUGS, BRugs and OpenBugs. Not exactly a common component of your average "validated" toolchain... Thanks, Emmanuel, I knew of the tenor of that document, but had not located it before. To be fair, SAS R SPSS are not mentioned in that document because it refers to Bayesian only. And I am a bit reluctant using these: Taking into account that there are not too many alternatives, when checking for updates I am always surprised that nothing has changed the last year. JAGS should be added, probably, Martyn seems to advance it actively. Greetings from Tübingen Dieter -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Use-of-R-in-clinical-trials-tp1559402p1565708.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
