Thanks to all. I was cofused and forgot that in is.na(x) <- value,
value is an index vector. Clearly stated on the help page. So Bert's
suggestion is the right one.
Den 2022-12-16 kl. 19:44, skrev Jeff Newmiller:
I don't find _either_ of these acceptable.
On the other hand,
x[ is.na( x ) ] <- 1
should have no effect on x.
On December 16, 2022 10:28:52 AM PST, "Göran Broström" <goran.brost...@umu.se>
wrote:
I'm confused:
x <- 1:2
is.na(x) <- 1
x
[1] NA 2
OK, but
x <- c("A", "B")
is.na(x) <- "A"
x
A
"A" "B" NA
What happens?
G_ran
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
