The first article had no code and did not describe a formula that I could find which matched your code. The second article is behind a paywall.
— David. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 3, 2022, at 3:39 PM, Bogdan Tanasa <tan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear Aaron, David, and everyone, > > Thank you again for your comments on my question related to the confidence > intervals. I am sorry for the late reply. > > The definition of the 95 confidence intervals where our discussion originates > from has been proposed by the authors of these two articles (I am including > the links to the articles just to show that the formula has been published in > a methods article a while ago; the articles are in the field of biology > though, where not too many of you are part of, I guess). These authors have > written the scripts and they have made those available on github. I have > asked a while ago the authors why they have chosen this formula, however, I > have not received any reply. In any case, at this moment I will use the > mathematical formulas described in the articles : > > https://www.cell.com/molecular-cell/fulltext/S1097-2765(15)00304-4 > > https://www.nature.com/articles/s41596-019-0218-7 > > Wishing everyone a good weekend, > > Bogdan > > > >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 6:53 PM Ebert,Timothy Aaron <teb...@ufl.edu> wrote: >> I have a general dislike of "analysis emergencies." I would like to see a >> data emergency wherein someone must cram 3 years of data collection into 18 >> months so that they have time to work out the correct analysis. I am sure >> others would suggest working out how analyze the data before starting the >> experiment. >> >> Our business office gives this advice to faculty members: An emergency on >> your part is not an emergency on our part. >> >> How about starting by answering the questions posted by the people you are >> hoping will help. Focus on David's middle paragraph. However, if you can >> re-code everything to work, then it would seem that you already know the >> answer and it might be simpler/faster to write the correct code. >> >> You might spend some time looking for a scientific paper that uses that >> equation for the confidence interval and thereby get some context to explain >> why the equation is correct. >> >> Tim >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: R-help <r-help-boun...@r-project.org> On Behalf Of Bogdan Tanasa >> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2022 8:55 PM >> To: David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net> >> Cc: r-help <r-help@r-project.org> >> Subject: Re: [R] confidence intervals >> >> [External Email] >> >> Hi David, >> >> Thank you for your comments, and feed-back message. I am very happy to learn >> from the experience of the people on R mailing list, and without any doubt, >> I am very thankful to you and to everyone for sharing their knowledge. I do >> apologize for any confusion that I have created unwillingly with my previous >> email. >> >> About my previous email related to the confidence intervals: indeed I have >> posted the question with a detailed description on stackoverflow, and the >> link is listed below. >> >> I have to admit that I have been in rush willing to have the suggestions of >> R-help members by Monday (if that would have been possible), as I have to >> make a decision at the beginning of this week on whether I need to re-code >> the shell script in R. I have a deadline on Wed. The script itself is less >> important per se, I have included it just to point our the origin of my >> question. >> >> I do certainly respect the principles of online R-help community, and I >> would very much appreciate if I could have your advice on the following : >> shall a "R code related emergency" arise, would it be acceptable to post the >> question on stackoverflow with the corresponding data tables and detailed >> code, and to refer the posting on R-help mailing list ? >> >> If it is acceptable at least for a single email, and if you do not mind, I >> could mention the link to stackoverflow, inviting our members to read it, >> shall they be comfortable with this topic. >> >> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F73507697%2Fconfidence-intervals-of-a-biological-assay%3Fnoredirect%3D1%23comment129816241_73507697&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da89592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C637973313343894313%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8sF7j4OCgH12qx4d8NCiw1%2FDbPa6nrui27S9C3ZNuL0%3D&reserved=0 >> >> Thanks a lot, have a good week ! >> >> ~ Bogdan >> >> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F73507697%2Fconfidence-intervals-of-a-biological-assay%3Fnoredirect%3D1%23comment129816241_73507697&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da89592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C637973313343894313%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8sF7j4OCgH12qx4d8NCiw1%2FDbPa6nrui27S9C3ZNuL0%3D&reserved=0 >> >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022, 6:52 PM David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net> >> wrote: >> >> > You cross-posted this to StackOverflow and did not say so. ... and >> > you posted in HTML Bad dog squared. I cast one of the close votes on >> > SO, but here I can only say ... READ the Posting Guide. >> > >> > You also give no citation other than someone's Github files with >> > minimal comments in that material. You should indicate whether this >> > code has any solid support. Why do you think this code is something to >> > depend upon? >> > >> > After all, you been posting questions on R-help for several months. >> > Don't you think you should make a good faith effort to understand the >> > principles underlying this resource? >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > David. >> > >> > On 8/26/22 17:55, Bogdan Tanasa wrote: >> > > Dear all, >> > > >> > > Although I know that it is not a statistics mailing list, given my >> > > work >> > on >> > > ICeChIP >> > > >> > > >> > https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith >> > ub.com%2Fshah-rohan%2Ficechip%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2FScripts%2FcomputeHMDan >> > dError&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da8 >> > 9592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C63797331334389431 >> > 3%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 >> > Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9HOH72K0Lj30w7tE%2BMN >> > oXakPbO1sasaujUTsnHFwDZo%3D&reserved=0 >> > > >> > > I would appreciate to have the answer to a question : >> > > >> > > given two variables a and b (a and b can have 1000 paired-values) >> > > and a calibration number "cal", >> > > >> > > why the 95 confidence interval has been calculated as such for each >> > > value >> > > a(i) and b(i) : >> > > >> > > 100 / cal * sqrt (( a/ (b^2) + (a^2) / (b ^3)) * 1.96 >> > > >> > > Thank you, >> > > >> > > Bogdan >> > > >> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> > > >> > > ______________________________________________ >> > > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see >> > > https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fst >> > > at.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fr-help&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%4 >> > > 0ufl.edu%7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da89592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a >> > > 62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C637973313344050547%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJW >> > > IjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C300 >> > > 0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KfmZ6PvxUVrbCMzVZcz6S2H2sqfWQmw2WIZHERwKDEk%3D& >> > > amp;reserved=0 >> > > PLEASE do read the posting guide >> > https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.r >> > -project.org%2Fposting-guide.html&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu% >> > 7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da89592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84% >> > 7C0%7C0%7C637973313344050547%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwM >> > DAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C& >> > sdata=127HvzZh7q9Xa7LaESHIEXIy3CdmUyQ3cxAVeOA%2Bukg%3D&reserved=0 >> > > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >> > >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see >> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstat.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fr-help&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da89592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C637973313344050547%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KfmZ6PvxUVrbCMzVZcz6S2H2sqfWQmw2WIZHERwKDEk%3D&reserved=0 >> PLEASE do read the posting guide >> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.r-project.org%2Fposting-guide.html&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7C0ba5d535471b46c05ec508da89592c20%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C637973313344050547%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=127HvzZh7q9Xa7LaESHIEXIy3CdmUyQ3cxAVeOA%2Bukg%3D&reserved=0 >> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
