Hi David, Thank you for your comments, and feed-back message. I am very happy to learn from the experience of the people on R mailing list, and without any doubt, I am very thankful to you and to everyone for sharing their knowledge. I do apologize for any confusion that I have created unwillingly with my previous email.
About my previous email related to the confidence intervals: indeed I have posted the question with a detailed description on stackoverflow, and the link is listed below. I have to admit that I have been in rush willing to have the suggestions of R-help members by Monday (if that would have been possible), as I have to make a decision at the beginning of this week on whether I need to re-code the shell script in R. I have a deadline on Wed. The script itself is less important per se, I have included it just to point our the origin of my question. I do certainly respect the principles of online R-help community, and I would very much appreciate if I could have your advice on the following : shall a "R code related emergency" arise, would it be acceptable to post the question on stackoverflow with the corresponding data tables and detailed code, and to refer the posting on R-help mailing list ? If it is acceptable at least for a single email, and if you do not mind, I could mention the link to stackoverflow, inviting our members to read it, shall they be comfortable with this topic. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73507697/confidence-intervals-of-a-biological-assay?noredirect=1#comment129816241_73507697 Thanks a lot, have a good week ! ~ Bogdan https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73507697/confidence-intervals-of-a-biological-assay?noredirect=1#comment129816241_73507697 On Sat, Aug 27, 2022, 6:52 PM David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net> wrote: > You cross-posted this to StackOverflow and did not say so. ... and you > posted in HTML Bad dog squared. I cast one of the close votes on SO, but > here I can only say ... READ the Posting Guide. > > You also give no citation other than someone's Github files with minimal > comments in that material. You should indicate whether this code has any > solid support. Why do you think this code is something to depend upon? > > After all, you been posting questions on R-help for several months. > Don't you think you should make a good faith effort to understand the > principles underlying this resource? > > > -- > > David. > > On 8/26/22 17:55, Bogdan Tanasa wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > Although I know that it is not a statistics mailing list, given my work > on > > ICeChIP > > > > > https://github.com/shah-rohan/icechip/blob/master/Scripts/computeHMDandError > > > > I would appreciate to have the answer to a question : > > > > given two variables a and b (a and b can have 1000 paired-values) and a > > calibration number "cal", > > > > why the 95 confidence interval has been calculated as such for each value > > a(i) and b(i) : > > > > 100 / cal * sqrt (( a/ (b^2) + (a^2) / (b ^3)) * 1.96 > > > > Thank you, > > > > Bogdan > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
