Yes. :-) Best regards -- Gerrit
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Gerrit Eichner Mathematical Institute, Room 212 gerrit.eich...@math.uni-giessen.de Justus-Liebig-University Giessen Tel: +49-(0)641-99-32104 Arndtstr. 2, 35392 Giessen, Germany http://www.uni-giessen.de/eichner --------------------------------------------------------------------- Am 31.03.2021 um 21:29 schrieb Sorkin, John:
Colleagues, I would like to make certain that my understanding of the tabular output produced by cox.zph is correct. Am I correct that the NULL hypothesis being tested is that the hazard is proportional in time? Therefor a non-significant result indicates that we don't have evidence that the proportional hazards assumption is incorrect and we can assume that the hazard is proportional. A significant result indicates that we have evidence that the proportional hazards assumption is violated. Thank you, John John David Sorkin M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Chief, Biostatistics and Informatics University of Maryland School of Medicine Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine Baltimore VA Medical Center 10 North Greene Street GRECC (BT/18/GR) Baltimore, MD 21201-1524 (Phone) 410-605-7119 (Fax) 410-605-7913 (Please call phone number above prior to faxing) ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
