Adam, > because I did not have time to entirely test
Do you (or does your company) have an automated test suite in place? R 2.10.0 is nearly two years old, and R 2.12.0 is nearly one. Matthew "AdamMarczak" <adam.marc...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1314385041626-3771731.p...@n4.nabble.com... > No, it's not much faster. I'd say it's faster about 10-15% in my case. > > I dont want neither plyr or data.table package because our software on the > server does not support R version over 2.10 and both of them have > dependency for R >= 2.12. Also I do not want to use old archives because I > did not have time to entirely test them as it was quick demand for > workaround. > > Best regards, > Adam. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/ddply-from-plyr-package-any-alternatives-tp3765936p3771731.html > Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
