No, it's not much faster. I'd say it's faster about 10-15% in my case. I dont want neither plyr or data.table package because our software on the server does not support R version over 2.10 and both of them have dependency for R >= 2.12. Also I do not want to use old archives because I did not have time to entirely test them as it was quick demand for workaround.
Best regards, Adam. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/ddply-from-plyr-package-any-alternatives-tp3765936p3771731.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
