On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Gary Kotton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Open Issues: > I think that at some stage or another we should discuss backporting of > specific plugin updates. For example, do we want to move the NVP provider > network support to folsom stable? > I think critical plugin "fixes" should be backported, but such fixes should be small and targeted changes (<100 LOC) to functionality that was already supposed to work in the original version of the release. To me, something like adding provider network support is a large change, and is something that was not supported for that plugin in the primary release, so I would say on both accounts it does not apply for backporting. Dan > > Thanks > Gary > > -- > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~**quantum-core<https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core> > Post to : > [email protected].**net<[email protected]> > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~**quantum-core<https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core> > More help : > https://help.launchpad.net/**ListHelp<https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp> > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dan Wendlandt Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com twitter: danwendlandt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
