Some more inline comments from me. On 12 November 2012 10:18, Gary Kotton <gkot...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, > Prior to tonight's meeting there are a number of updates (tonight I'll try > and get the times correct): > 1. *Stable branch*: This is moving along nicely. The current situation is > as follows: > - Pending stable review: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15771/ (OpenSSL Zombies) > Padraig Brady has a problem with that patch. Not sure if you want to take action. > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15629/ (Ensure 400 return codes) > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15490/ (Cidr overlapping check) > - Pending upstream review: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15663/ (Qpid is causing Quantum > service to hang after reboot - this is pending common review). > https://review.openstack.org/15758 (multiple floating ip's on a > port) > https://review.openstack.org/15872 (Ensure 400 return codes for > invalid L3 inputs) > - Pending fixes: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1077292 (needs a little > fix following comments on the bug) > I will complete this review today, possibly before the team meeting. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1056437 (provider support > for external networks) > 2. *Upstream development*: The improvement of the VIF plugins is in the > works. Hopefully in the coming week I'll make some progress on this. In my > opinion this is stuck until we get the following patches in: > (nova) - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/14830/ > (quantum) - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/14961/ > There is/was concern that if one gets in prior to the other then > everything may break. I can write a number of patches to ensure backward > compatibility but my take is that there are not many people using > linuxbridge at the moment and there is a work around for the intermediate > period. > 3. *General*: > - there is a nice pile of patches waiting for review. we need to try > and move these along. i am a bit frustrated with a bit of code re-factoring > that is just consuming my review cycles and not really achieving anything. > any ideas regarding this? > I hope I reviewed all of them. I noticed most if not all of them were from a single submitter. I wrote on gerrit that in general we appreciate when a patch is divided in smaller chunks, but in this case it would have been to have a single patch. - unit tests are chewing up a lot of memory ( > https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1065276). i have made no progress > here and if someone else could help it would be great. > Consider me for help. I am catching up on this topic, and should be able to do some work during this week. > Thanks > Gary > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core > Post to : quantum-core@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core Post to : quantum-core@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
