On 11/19/2012 01:07 PM, Akihiro MOTOKI wrote:
I was also reviewing the metadata patch, but it seems there are plenty of core
devs on it.
So I will move to the iptables security group patch,
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/16210/,
where Gary is the only core at the moment.
I am also reviewing iptables security group patch.
I created a Wiki page about Quantum security groups.
It includes some discussions in other patch review on security groups
behaviors. I hope it will help you to review the patch.
http://wiki.openstack.org/Quantum/SecurityGroups
Is there a devstack patch with support? This may speed up the process of
testing.
Thanks,
Akihiro
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:21:24 +0100
From: Salvatore Orlando<sorla...@nicira.com>
Subject: Re: [Quantum-core] G-1 review status
Hi,
as we approach the milestone branch point release rush, I just wanted to give
you a heads up of
the patches I am actively reviewing:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15726/ ('Fix context problem' with Mark
McClain) - Lots of
progress made, but still some concerns remain. IMHO they can be sorted out
before branch point.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15619/ ('l3 agent RPC' with Gary Kotton and
Mark McClain) - Some
progress made over the weekend. Still, it is a fairly big patch, and I am
reviewing it again now.
I am not entirely sure we and Yong will have enough cycles to address all
comments and merge this
patch)
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15733/ ('bp/quantum-services-framrwork with
Yong, Gary, and Mark)
- It's almost good to go. Easily mergeable by branch point.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15758/ ('floating ip association checks with
Akihiro and Yong) -
should be merged by today IMO.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15209/ ('router-show output formatting' with
Yong) - Yong has
raised some concerns, I am reviewing it again now.
I was also reviewing the metadata patch, but it seems there are plenty of core
devs on it.
So I will move to the iptables security group patch,
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/16210/,
where Gary is the only core at the moment.
Salvatore
On 14 November 2012 17:20, Dan Wendlandt<d...@nicira.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
If you're in the "TO" field of this email, it means you have an item
targeted at G-1 that is
"HIGH" priority but not yet in IMPLEMENTED or NEEDS CODE REVIEW state.
Please post these
items for review and update their status to NEEDS CODE REVIEW, or we will
move them to G-2.
At the team meeting we should have confirmed at least two core dev
reviewers for each of
these items, so please make sure those reviewers are notified when you
post the review.
Thanks!
Dan
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Wendlandt
Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[2<text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
Post to : quantum-core@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
Post to : quantum-core@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
