> I was also reviewing the metadata patch, but it seems there are plenty of > core devs on it. > So I will move to the iptables security group > patch, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/16210/, > where Gary is the only core at the moment.
I am also reviewing iptables security group patch. I created a Wiki page about Quantum security groups. It includes some discussions in other patch review on security groups behaviors. I hope it will help you to review the patch. http://wiki.openstack.org/Quantum/SecurityGroups Thanks, Akihiro >>>>> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:21:24 +0100 >>>>> From: Salvatore Orlando <sorla...@nicira.com> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Quantum-core] G-1 review status > > Hi, > > as we approach the milestone branch point release rush, I just wanted to give > you a heads up of > the patches I am actively reviewing: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15726/ ('Fix context problem' with Mark > McClain) - Lots of > progress made, but still some concerns remain. IMHO they can be sorted out > before branch point. > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15619/ ('l3 agent RPC' with Gary Kotton and > Mark McClain) - Some > progress made over the weekend. Still, it is a fairly big patch, and I am > reviewing it again now. > I am not entirely sure we and Yong will have enough cycles to address all > comments and merge this > patch) > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15733/ ('bp/quantum-services-framrwork with > Yong, Gary, and Mark) > - It's almost good to go. Easily mergeable by branch point. > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15758/ ('floating ip association checks with > Akihiro and Yong) - > should be merged by today IMO. > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15209/ ('router-show output formatting' with > Yong) - Yong has > raised some concerns, I am reviewing it again now. > > I was also reviewing the metadata patch, but it seems there are plenty of > core devs on it. > So I will move to the iptables security group > patch, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/16210/, > where Gary is the only core at the moment. > > Salvatore > > On 14 November 2012 17:20, Dan Wendlandt <d...@nicira.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > If you're in the "TO" field of this email, it means you have an item > targeted at G-1 that is > "HIGH" priority but not yet in IMPLEMENTED or NEEDS CODE REVIEW state. > Please post these > items for review and update their status to NEEDS CODE REVIEW, or we will > move them to G-2. > At the team meeting we should have confirmed at least two core dev > reviewers for each of > these items, so please make sure those reviewers are notified when you > post the review. > Thanks! > > Dan > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Dan Wendlandt > Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com > twitter: danwendlandt > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > [2 <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>] > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core > Post to : quantum-core@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core Post to : quantum-core@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
