Isn't back scatter exactly the intent of the spammer? Send the spam to invalid addresses with a forged return which is where the reject goes.
But you could be right: back scatter may be so specific that these two scripts would be the only ones ever to go into the folder. "Addresses" or "addressees" or even rcptto. -- Sent from my Android. "Robert Spier" <rsp...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> One solution would be to add a new directory named 'backscatter' and >> put both scripts in there with the same prefix (check_goodrcptto) and >> with a distinguishing suffix (_postfix & _qmail). That would be clear >> to people that are interested in the subject. > >Yes. Except backscatter isn't quite the right kind of descriptive >name. Maybe recipients? addresses? > >-R
