Works 4 me. -- Sent from my Android. "Matt Sergeant" <m...@sergeant.org> wrote:
>Should we have plugins/qmail and plugins/postfix dirs? > >Todd Brunhoff wrote: >> Tim's view seems appropriate. His script is centered on qmail, and >> mine is centered on postfix (or more specifically, on /etc/aliases). >> Both scripts are probably best in their current form with appropriate > >> disclosures. Let me know if there is any prep work you would like me >> to do to my script. >> >> Todd >> >> On 3/9/2011 7:23 AM, Tim Meadowcroft wrote: >>> On Sunday 06 March 2011 06:42:50 Robert Spier wrote: >>>> Todd Brunhoff wrote: >>>>> Your scripts look like they have a good deal of qmail >>>>> sophistication. Some years ago I ran qmail 1.0.3, after each >major >>>>> system crash, I would revisit whether to use qmail, and >eventually >>>>> decided to switch to qpsmtp+postfix because both seem to have >>>>> better >>>>> support. And in fact, the reason I included /etc/alias was to >>>>> replace the very useful alias mechanism in qmail. I really >didn't >>>>> need much, so that was sufficient for me. >>>>> >>>>> So it seems that among these collections of scripts there are >>>>> backscatter solutions for qmail sites and qpsmtp sites. Perhaps >one of >>>>> the developers can fold these into a contrib folder? >>>> A lot of plugins are linked from the wiki, http://wiki.qpsmtpd.org. >>>> >>>> check_goodrcptto looks like something that might be worth having in >>>> core. Tim and Todd, are you interested in reconciling the >differences >>>> between your versions? (Maybe some sort of configuration >interface?) >>> Mine is very qmail specific - I sort of feel generalising it would >>> make it >>> worse. Either you use qmail, in which case you might like it as it >>> stands, >>> (possibly in addition to other recipient checks) or you don't use >>> qmail, in >>> which case you can ignore it completely. >>> >>> I've posted the source (with disclaimers - I'm still on qpsmtpd >>> v0.28) at >>> >>> http://schmerg.com/checkgoodrcptto-a-qpsmtpd-plugin-for-checking >>> >>> and will see about adding it to the wiki when I can set up an >account >>> there. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> -- >>> Tim
