On 2007-10-15 17:29:29 +0200, Hanno Hecker wrote: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:40:34 -0400 > Guy Hulbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 15:12 +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > > > [0] There's a draft RFC for an extension which I would like to implement > > > some day, but it won't solve the problem until it is also implemented by > > > most clients. > > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-05 > >
Nope, that's not an SMTP extension. > More likely this one: > http://www.courier-mta.org/draft-varshavchik-verp-smtpext.txt Actually I was thinking about this one: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hall-prdr-00 (I hope that's the newest version - Eric Hall changed the name a few times). But I know of the Varshavchik draft, too, although I've forgotten the details. When Eric wrote his draft, I wrote a short comparison of all the similar proposals I could find: http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/msg02949.html hp -- _ | Peter J. Holzer | I know I'd be respectful of a pirate |_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | with an emu on his shoulder. | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Sam in "Freefall"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
