On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:51:34 -0500 Keith Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And "exim" does? Qpsmtpd has always been about putting out the fire of > > spam for me. Quench fit that perfectly. Plus I can't find any other > > software project called that which is a huge bonus. > > "Quench" is definitely an improvement over "Qpsmtpd", except for How about QPQPsmtpd, for Quick, Polling, Qmailish Perly SMTPD. But isn't the high_perf branch going to be integrated into the qpsmtpd once it's shaken out? If so, then I say let's just stick to qpsmtpd, which has name recognition and whose functionality is clear from the name. Brian
