"Robin S. Socha" wrote:
> 
> * Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> From: "David Dyer-Bennet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> >>> "Upgrade" suggests adding features, rather more than "patch" does;
> >>> patches are often released to fix bugs.
> 
> >> How about "addition" or "extension"?
> 
> > I vote for "source code plug-ins". :-)
> 
> Ummm... Nope. A plug-in is something one plugs in. Like relay-ctrl. Patches
> are not. A tool to magically merge patches one needs into one big patch
> (like Felix' jumbo patch) would be really neat (like, smtp-auth fails
> with the other patches I need applied).


Why not put together something like that.. a versioning tool for qmail
and patches... 
have a published standard format for dealing with it and specifing the
details for
each patch (Module)..

Jonathan Smith

Reply via email to