> A license has the potential to be just as ill-worded, confusing, or > extremely technical as anything else. A clearly worded, easily > supportable legal document would be good, regardless of whether it > were a license. Here is a question: Does anyone know if the GPL and/or BSD license has ever been challenged in court? What were the results? The reason I ask this is until there is case law that supports what is put forth in these style of agreements then someone may not want to release their software into that realm. - "One of the best examples of pure democracy in action is the lynch mob" - AA4YU
- Re: secrets and lies Michael T. Babcock
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Michael T. Babcock
- Re: secrets and lies David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Michael T. Babcock
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Michael T. Babcock
- Re: secrets and lies Vinko Vrsalovic
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Russ Allbery
- RE: secrets and lies zone
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller