On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 05:16:17PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote: > That's true of softwarelaw.html, but this bit of the thread was about > rights.html, which includes no such references. rights.html doesn't say anything about the licensing of djbdns. Instead, it poses the question: do you have the legal right to use the web, in the absence of explicit copyright notices on every document element you encounter? It's an interesting question, but I don't see that the discussion in this thread really relates to that issue. -- Raul
- Re: secrets and lies Michael T. Babcock
- Re: secrets and lies Vinko Vrsalovic
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Russ Allbery
- RE: secrets and lies zone
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Felix von Leitner
- Re: secrets and lies Greg Hudson
- Re: secrets and lies David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: secrets and lies Romeyn Prescott
- Re: secrets and lies Adam McKenna
- Re: secrets and lies Romeyn Prescott