Re: qmail list reply-to

[Russell Nelson]

Charles McLagan writes:
 > Now, one can trash Microsoft, or Netscape, or whoever
 > makes the MUA, but the bottom line is, this is how they
 > work and this is how 99% of users would use them even
 > if there were a reply-to-recipient choice.
 > 
 > So the question is: is there a sensible (or kludgey, hack,
 > yet sufficient) way to cope with it today?

No.  Reply-to-Recipient is necessary and sufficient.

-- 
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  http://russnelson.com | A hate crime makes
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | it illegal to think certain
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | thoughts.  The crime is
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | itself already a crime.