Robin S. Socha writes:
> * Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Bob Ross writes:
>
> >> I noticed that also. Some just select reply to all, and it will go
> >> both places, but then the person you're replying to will get two of
> >> the same email every time.
>
> > Your MUA needs a "Reply to Recipient" command.
>
> Actually, he needs:
>
> ,----[ Gnus manual ]
> | `broken-reply-to'
> | Elements like `(broken-reply-to . t)' signals that `Reply-To'
> | headers in this group are to be ignored. This can be useful if
> | you're reading a mailing list group where the listserv has inserted
> | `Reply-To' headers that point back to the listserv itself. This is
> | broken behavior. So there!
> `----
No, actually he needs a "Reply to Recipient" command. Think about it.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com | A hate crime makes
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | it illegal to think certain
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | thoughts. The crime is
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | itself already a crime.
