On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 08:32:37PM -0600, Irwan Hadi wrote:
> I saw, at least at evaluation 3, postfix beat qmail ;)
BTW, still don't know how about exact configuration that the author's
using while doing the experiments.
If this information could be gathered from:
http://www.kyoto.wide.ad.jp/mta/eval1/eoperation.html
then one can make a conclusion that the authors no nothing about
postfix. /etc/postfix/master.cf has nothing todo with concurrency
control in postfix, at least if he think that it has the same fashion
as qmail.
Salam,
P.Y. Adi Prasaja
- Re: Anti Virus Robin S. Socha
- RE: Anti Virus Slider
- Re: Anti Virus Robin S. Socha
- Re: Anti Virus Jason Haar
- Re: Anti Virus Alexander Pennace
- Re: Anti Virus Eric Cox
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: Mailing list performance David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: Mailing list performance Irwan Hadi
- Re: Mailing list performance P.Y. Adi Prasaja
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: Mailing list performance P.Y. Adi Prasaja
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: Mailing list performance P.Y. Adi Prasaja
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: Mailing list performance P.Y. Adi Prasaja
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing list performa... Ronny Haryanto
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing list per... Dave Sill
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing list... Ronny Haryanto
