On 02-Aug-2000, Dave Sill wrote: > 1) Postfix only uses a single uid. qmail uses six. Why is using more than one uid better? What sort of security problem would using one uid potentially pose? > 2) Wietse's code is buggier than Dan's. Check the historical record. > (To be fair, *everyone's* code is buggier than Dan's. :-) Well, IMHO, nobody's perfect, period :). Although I'm sure Dan and Wietse are two of the very best in the field. > Postfix *can* be configured to run chrooted, which is a plus for > it. But that doesn't outweigh the above. Thanks for the insight. Ronny
- Re: Mailing list performance P.Y. Adi Prasaja
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: Mailing list performance P.Y. Adi Prasaja
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: Mailing list performance P.Y. Adi Prasaja
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: Mailing list performance P.Y. Adi Prasaja
- Re: Mailing list performance Dave Sill
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing list perform... Ronny Haryanto
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing list pe... Dave Sill
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing lis... Ronny Haryanto
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: why qmail is more secure, was: Mailing list pe... David Dyer-Bennet
