On Thu, 25 May 2000, listy-dyskusyjne Krzysztof Dabrowski wrote:
>There is realy no point in using qpopper. I have used it in isp enviroment
>and i can say that it sucks.
>It doesn't do any mailbox locking, it just copies the whole thing to temp
>dir back and forth. this kills the performace. (id 3.x better?).
Qpopper works fine for us, there is also a server-mode directive to change
this default behavior to be more like a regular pop server, it will NOT
copy the file and cause chunking on the HD.
>You have a broad choice:
>
>a) qmail-pop3d - maildir only, lightweight, good
maildir only, one downside....
>b) cucipop - this is what i use at the moment, mailbox only, fast, small
no longer supported, as has been mentioned, the last "version" was circa
1998.
>c) popa3d - by solar designer - small, fast, compatible, mailbox only
i have no experience with this.
>d) solid pop3d - quality from Poland - like the above but with more
>features, maildir & mailbox
I have no experience with the above either.
--
_ __ _____ __ _________
______________ /_______ ___ ____ /______ John Gonzalez/Net.Tech
__ __ \ __ \ __/_ __ `__ \/ __ /_ ___/ MDC Computers/netMDC!
_ / / / `__/ /_ / / / / / / /_/ / / /__ (505)437-7600/fax-437-3052
/_/ /_/\___/\__/ /_/ /_/ /_/\__,_/ \___/ http://www.netmdc.com
[---------------------------------------------[system info]-----------]
12:25pm up 14 days, 17:51, 4 users, load average: 0.04, 0.08, 0.06
