Unknown. The advisory specifically mentions 2.53 -- i can tell you this.
2.53 _was_ safe from the PREVIOUS exploits (ie. the ones that worked on
the 2.51, etc) but this appears to be a new exploit in a different
function of the program.
Also, the advisory suggests upgrading to 3.1b1 (which i did) and says that
it's a safe version (for now, anyway)
Are there any known exploits for 2.1b1?
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
>Wasn't it claimed that 2.53 was safe -- only earlier versions
>(alpha/beta?) were at risk? Seems like they should just release
>another version to lessen the confusion.
>
>Scott
>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: 2.6.2
>
>iQCVAwUBOSwjblpGPE+AF6qBAQEiZwQAvICxK3K0VPNxX4v7agjf5owZ6ZtDPC9r
>3egzkz30iQDHNSTNskPC8IQlVV4PBgthIjY7rJvFQBzE9zgRevF0MVvQ4+WdAeyM
>YLLl72l3pqr0y70qWfD72+6EyRwscb2yBaIvNK6Vk3/t58i8anL0iQO0aeIQYrvL
>cbNH+O6S74w=
>=ZbNr
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
_ __ _____ __ _________
______________ /_______ ___ ____ /______ John Gonzalez/Net.Tech
__ __ \ __ \ __/_ __ `__ \/ __ /_ ___/ MDC Computers/netMDC!
_ / / / `__/ /_ / / / / / / /_/ / / /__ (505)437-7600/fax-437-3052
/_/ /_/\___/\__/ /_/ /_/ /_/\__,_/ \___/ http://www.netmdc.com
[---------------------------------------------[system info]-----------]
1:30pm up 13 days, 18:56, 4 users, load average: 0.16, 0.16, 0.17
