Forgive me, have you used a online test for openrelays? For some test
softwares qmail might appear as an openrelay even it is not open. There is
a patch for that.
>> No. this happened in a production box.
Here goes what happened: This box has been stable for more than a week - I had added q-s and ClamAV to it - and then, nothing special related to, it started logging all connections as a Relay_Client, even for local deliveries, valid messages and, of course, spammers.
I had reviewed my code and could not find anything related to a bad thing in it.
It is - basically - all based on spamcontrol patch. I had added a few changes due to a message discard feature, where message is completely transfered and never delivered. So, I don't warn spammers that their message is blocked by sender info, for instance.
As far as I understand, RELAYCLIENT is analyzed by an env setting *only* and, according to log, all connections had it set.
This happened to every different hosts that were sending messages and tcpserver info showed that connections were being opened and closed, but I cannot garantee that some of them were kept opened for new connections somehow and, then, inheriting RELAYCLIENT set...
Well, completely suprised and lost here...
- [Qmail-scanner-general]Non-sense issue?? Aecio F. Neto
- Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Non-sense issue?? Salvatore Toribio
- Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Non-sense issue?? Ivan Toledo
- Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Non-sense issue?? Aecio F. Neto
- Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Non-sense issue?? toribio
- Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Non-sense issue?? Aecio F. Neto
- Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Non-sense issue?? Salvatore Toribio
- Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Non-sense issue?? Aecio F. Neto