Murriel G. Perez Dev wrote:
When we first spec'd it all out, NAI seemed to be the least expensive and most reliable, at least from the general overview.
ClamAV had originally been our first choice, but management was concerned about relative efficiency compared with commercial scanners, availability of support, and recovery/conversion in the case that the project was discontinued or definitions no longer updated.
From the sounds of it though, it seems like it might be worth taking another shot at pushing ClamAV.
Run both then. I would always recommend two. However, I would also recommend that you only use "daemonized" AV scanners (trophie,clamav,etc) as their performance is "only" 10-100 times faster than the non-daemonized versions.
-- Cheers
Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
