Murriel G. Perez Dev wrote:
I am preparing to set up Qmail-Scanner on a Red Hat 8.0 box with a live qmail install and several virtual domains that are getting overloaded with spam and viruses.
I am planning to use the Network Associates VirusScan Command Line Scanner.
Any reason for that choice? It doesn't have a daemon version - so it will be slower than other options (such as the free and very good ClamAV)
Also, has anyone set this up as a relay, changing the MX so that mail is redirected to the Linux server first for scanning before forwarding it to a (gasp) Exchange server ?
I'd imagine quite a large percentage of Qmail-Scanner sites met that criteria. Works fine.
-- Cheers
Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
