On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:38:57 +1300 Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >BTW, I'd suggest to allow "double-barreled" attachments when both extensions > >are the same. For example, I recently got a message: > >Disallowed double-barrelled attachment filename (vaidoto_1__1_.doc.doc) - > >potential virus > >This situation can occur quite often. And even .exe.exe is no more dangerous > >than .exe... > > Qmail-Scanner already does that check. If you have evidence otherwise, > please forward me the quaratined file as an attachment, and I'll have a > look. It's name in email message is: Content-Type: application/msword;name="vaidoto[1][1].doc.doc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vaidoto[1][1].doc.doc" I think you can recreate the attachment with such name. Please tell me if I should still send it to you. Regards, Nerijus ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
