On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 08:00:36AM -0400, Doug Monroe wrote: > >Also check it isn't just a out of memory issue - maybe you need to up your > >memory limits? (I can't see why as clamdscan won't use a lot of RAM. But > >are > >you running clamd under softlimits? That would do it) > > clamscan not clamdscan (yes...someday I'll move to clad [just need > time]) but...yes...I can run clamscan with -m fine > Current softlimit fwiw is 18000000
But have you run it manually with softlimit set to 18000000? i.e. softlimit -a 18000000 clamscan ..... if you get the same error, then your softlimit is too small. This is actually another good reason to use clamd. The softlimit settings can be left lower as it's a separate process that swallows the RAM. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
